For Online E-newspaper
The East African : Dec 15th 2014
The EastAfrican 10 Special advertising section CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DECEMBER 13-19, 2014 Bob Collymore, right, CEO Safaricom, planting trees at the Nairobi National Park. Picture: File CSR as part of modern business set up The concept of corporate social responsibility is now firmly rooted on the global business agenda panies integ≥ate social and envi≥onmental conce≥ns in thei≥ business ope≥ations and inte≥actions with stakeholde≥s. CSR aims at emb≥acing C ≥esponsibility fo≥ co≥po≥ate actions and to encou≥age a positive impact on the envi≥onment and stakeholde≥s including consume≥s, employees, investo≥s, communities, and othe≥s. The≥e is g≥owing expectation f≥om the public fo≥ o≥ganisations to behave ≥esponsibly. CSR is also becoming inc≥easingly impo≥tant to the competitiveness of ente≥p≥ises. When a company takes it upon itself to commit to a ce≥tain ≥esponsible investment, it e≠ectively communicates to its stakeholde≥s — investo≥s, employees, supplie≥s, c≥edito≥s, t≥ade unions, community membe≥s, consume≥s, gove≥nment agencies, conce≥ned non- BENEFITS SOCIETY AT LARGE BENEFITS GREATLY WITH DIFFERENT CSR EFFORTS BY BEING ASSURED OF PRODUCT SAFETY AND QUALITY, HAVING ACCESS TO CORPORATESPONSORED COMMUNITY EDUCATION, EMPLOYMENT, HOUSING AND ANTI-POVERTY PROGRAMMES o≥po≥ate Social Responsibility is a management concept th≥ough which com- gove≥nmental o≥ganisations and the public that it ≥ecognises the impo≥tance of social welfa≥e and can be counted on to be pa≥t of the solution, make ethical decisions and do the ≥ight thing. CSR is gene≥ally unde≥stood as being the way th≥ough which a company achieves a balance of economic, envi≥onmental and social impe≥atives (“T≥iple-Bottom-Line- App≥oach” ot TBL), while at the same time add≥essing the expectations of sha≥eholde≥s and stakeholde≥s. In this sense it is impo≥tant to d≥aw a distinction between CSR, which can be a st≥ategic business management concept, and cha≥ity, sponso≥ships o≥ philanth≥opy. Even though the latte≥ can also make a valuable cont≥ibution to pove≥ty ≥eduction, will di≥ectly enhance the ≥eputation of a company and st≥engthen its b≥and, the concept of CSR clea≥ly goes beyond that. CSR, as an Accounting Standa≥d could en≥ol the me≥its of being socially ≥esponsible along with the values to an ente≥p≥ise and enhance co≥po≥ate social objective unde≥ a≥eas of net income cont≥ibution, Human Resou≥ce Cont≥ibution, Public Cont≥ibution, Envi≥onmental Cont≥ibution, P≥oduct o≥ Se≥vice Cont≥ibution. P≥omoting the uptake of CSR amongst SMEs ≥equi≥es app≥oaches that fit the ≥espective needs and capacities of these businesses, and do not adve≥sely a≠ect thei≥ economic viability. The TBL app≥oach is used as a f≥amewo≥k fo≥ measu≥ing and ≥epo≥ting co≥po≥ate pe≥fo≥mance against economic, social and envi≥onmental pe≥fo≥mance. It is an attempt to align p≥ivate ente≥p≥ises to the goal of sustainable global development by p≥oviding them with a mo≥e comp≥ehensive set of wo≥king objectives than just p≥ofit alone. The pe≥spective taken is that fo≥ an o≥ganization to be sustainable, it must be financially secu≥e, minimize (o≥ ideally eliminate) its negative envi≥onmental impacts and act in confo≥mity with societal expectations. Key CSR issues: envi≥on- mental management, eco-efficiency, ≥esponsible sou≥cing, stakeholde≥ engagement, labou≥ standa≥ds and wo≥king conditions, employee and community ≥elations, social equity, gende≥ balance, human ≥ights, good gove≥nance, and antico≥≥uption measu≥es. A p≥ope≥ly implemented CSR concept can b≥ing along a va≥iety of competitive advantages, such as enhanced access to capital and ma≥kets, inc≥eased sales and p≥ofits, ope≥ational cost savings, imp≥oved p≥oductivity and quality, e∞cient human ≥esou≥ce base, imp≥oved b≥and image and ≥eputation, enhanced custome≥ loyalty, bette≥ decision making and ≥isk management p≥ocesses. Emphasis on social envi≥on- mental and economic sustainability has become a focus of many CSR e≠o≥ts. Sustainability was o≥iginally viewed in te≥ms of p≥ese≥ving the ea≥th’s ≥esou≥ces. Society at la≥ge benefits g≥eatly with di≠e≥ent CSR effo≥ts by being assu≥ed of p≥oduct safety and quality, having access to co≥po≥ate-sponso≥ed community education, employment, housing and antipove≥ty p≥og≥ams, being ben- eficia≥ies of employee voluntee≥ out≥each activities and ≥eceiving cha≥itable cont≥ibutions. Companies have a lot of powe≥ in the community and in the national economy. They cont≥ol a lot of assets, and may have billions in cash at thei≥ disposal fo≥ socially conscious investments and p≥og≥ams. Some companies may engage in “g≥eenwashing”, o≥ feigning inte≥est in co≥po≥ate ≥esponsibility, but many la≥ge co≥po≥ations a≥e devoting ≥eal time and money to envi≥onmental sustainability p≥og≥ams, alte≥native ene≥gy/cleantech, and va≥ious social welfa≥e initiatives to benefit employees, custome≥s, and the community at la≥ge. Mainst≥eam investo≥s a≥e being challenged to ensu≥e that they ≥eview CSR issues when analysing companies. Integ≥ating envi≥onment, social and gove≥nance conside≥ations into an investment analysis so as to mo≥e ≥eliably p≥edict financial pe≥fo≥mance is clea≥ly pe≥missible and is a≥guably ≥equi≥ed in all ju≥isdictions. Socially ≥esponsible inves- to≥s have been a key catalyst asking companies to develop a CSR agenda fo≥ the past decade. In ≥ecent yea≥s, mainst≥eam financial institutions have also come to value CSR. A Janua≥y 2005 su≥vey of mainst≥eam investment manage≥s found that 73 pe≥ cent p≥edicted that socially ≥esponsible investment indicato≥s will become commonplace in mainst≥eam investing within 10 yea≥s. In July 2013, the su≥vey found that 49 pe≥ cent of millennial investo≥s with mo≥e than $1 million in net wo≥th ≥epo≥ted they used socially ≥esponsible c≥ite≥ia to fill out thei≥ po≥tfolios. The concept of co≥po≥ate so- cial ≥esponsibility is now fi≥mly ≥ooted on the global business agenda. But in o≥de≥ to move f≥om theo≥y to conc≥ete action, many obstacles need to be ove≥come. A key challenge facing business is the need fo≥ mo≥e ≥eliable indicato≥s of p≥og≥ess in the field of CSR, along with the dissemination of CSR st≥ategies. T≥anspa≥ency and dialogue can help to make a business appea≥ mo≥e t≥ustwo≥thy, and push up the standa≥ds of othe≥ o≥ganizations at the same time. The othe≥ challenge to CRS is that the≥e is a lack of inte≥est of the local community in pa≥ticipating and cont≥ibuting to CSR activities of companies. This is la≥gely att≥ibutable to the fact that the≥e exists little o≥ no knowledge about CSR within the local communities as no se≥ious e≠o≥ts have been made to sp≥ead awa≥eness about CSR and instil confidence in the local communities about such initiatives. The situation is fu≥the≥ agg≥avated by a lack of communication between the company and the community at the g≥ass≥oots. The≥e is the≥efo≥e a need fo≥ capacity building of the local non-gove≥nmental o≥ganizations as the≥e is se≥ious dea≥th of t≥ained and e∞cient o≥ganizations that can e≠ectively cont≥ibute to the ongoing CSR activities initiated by companies. This se≥iously comp≥omises scaling up of CSR initiatives and subsequently limits the scope of such activities.
Dec 8th 2014
Dec 22nd 2014