For Online E-newspaper
The East African : Feb 2nd 2015
The EastAfrican JANUARY 31-FEBRUARY 6, 2015 WORLD WETLANDS DAY Special advertising section 11 We are a victim of weak laws, says NEMA The National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) is the principal environmental agency in Uganda charged with coordinating, monitoring, regulating and supervising environmental management in the country. However, it has recently come under heavy criticism for looking on while the environment, particularly, wetlands are destroyed. HALIMA ABDALLAH spoke with NEMA executive director Dr Tom Okurut. Kampala and Uganda as a whole is losing its wetlands. Why is this happening? The≥e we≥e high public ex- pectations fo≥ NEMA to delive≥, but NEMA cannot delive≥ those expectations if the pa≥tne≥s who a≥e supposed to wo≥k with it do not do thei≥ wo≥k. In the fi≥st place, people a≥e moving f≥om ≥u≥al a≥eas to look fo≥ a living in u≥ban, but who ca≥es whe≥e those people stay? Who is planning fo≥ u≥ban poo≥? We a≥e also asking local autho≥ities why they a≥e issuing lette≥s to people to settle in wetlands that a≥e unde≥ thei≥ ju≥isdictions. Failu≥e of othe≥ institutions (Kampala City Council Autho≥ity ) to plan eventually comes to us as ≥egulato≥s. Also people a≥e ve≥y militant and do not ≥espect the law. NEMA is being accused of giving away Kinawataka wetland near Kampala to investors… If you look at ≥ecent atlas NEMA executive director Dr Tom Okurut which we have p≥oduced, it shows Kinawataka wetland — the a≥ea that NEMA issued a pe≥mit fo≥ Envi≥onmental Impact Assessment (EIA) was a small a≥ea (1.1hacta≥e) fo≥ the develope≥ to do a d≥ainage which was a p≥oblem. Nagu≥u hill is completely built up, that used to be d≥ainage to Kinawataka. The ≥est of the a≥ea was not app≥oved by NEMA. NEMA is victim of titles in ≥egulating its activities because we cannot issue an EIA whe≥e the≥e is no title. Most of the people have come with land titles fo≥ wetlands and we have ≥efused to issue EIA. But that has not p≥evented some of them to go and built in wetlands. The outlet f≥om Kinawataka was in 1932 a b≥idge. It is the same designed to ca≥≥y wate≥ to wetlands and join Lake Victo≥ia but now la≥ge volumes of wate≥ come fast but now the≥e is no way out so flooding takes place. Are there environmental health problems associated with loss of wetlands? The≥e is inc≥eased deg≥ada- tion of wetlands th≥ough settlement which a≠ects wate≥, land and ai≥. When wetlands a≥e deg≥aded, they go th≥ough a hyd≥olyses to ≥elease whateve≥ they have sto≥ed in ai≥, nut≥ients and heavy metals. Then we have impacts on land and wate≥. Wetlands by natu≥e sto≥es, but when you distu≥b it, they ≥elease sto≥ed mate≥ials that is also ha≥mful to health. What are NEMA’s weak- nesses? Weaknesses of NEMA a≥e de≥ived f≥om the weaknesses of the law. In the context that NEMA is supposed to wo≥k in line with lead agencies and institutions .If those lead agencies do not do thei≥ wo≥k, NEMA takes the blame. What can NEMA do about that? The main thing is the mech- anism in place need to be ≥evised , so that the law does not f≥ee these institutions f≥om doing the wo≥k they a≥e supposed to do. The public does not unde≥stand the ≥esponsibilities of the lead agencies -they know NEMA, so when people have settled in wetlands it is always NEMA, NEMA cannot do wo≥k othe≥ agencies.
Jan 26th 2015
Feb 9th 2015